Trial Lawyers for Public Justice banner

Trial Lawyers for Public Justice banner

Trial Lawyers for Public Justice logo

News button
Publications button
Current Cases button
Briefs and Documents button
Events and Awards button
About Us button
Contact Us button
Join Us/Contribute button
Job Openings button
Public Interest Database and Links button
Search This Site buttonShop TLPJ button
Home button

Read Our
Privacy Policy

Bobby Worldwide Approved 508
This page is Bobby Worldwide Approved for Section 508.

TLPJ in the News header

Consumer Watch

Still Getting Punished for Being Poor

BOB RICHARDS
The Capital Times (Madison, WI), March 8, 2003

Painting: Poor People on the Shore, by Pablo Picasso, 1903 Poor People on the Shore, 
by Pablo Picasso (1903).

It costs a lot of money to be poor in America.

Bankruptcy, check cashing and payday loan stores, credit reporting inaccuracies, and predatory lending all were frequent topics as activists recently gathered for the Consumer Federation of America's Consumer Assembly, the nation's largest annual meeting of consumer advocates.

"The Republican majority is going to again introduce a punitive bankruptcy bill," House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., told the group. "Now with the economy in worse shape with many more people out of work, the harsh impact of this legislation will be more widely felt than it would have been last year."

But Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, defended the measure at a different session, saying the bankruptcy system needs to be fixed because it allows wealthy people to abuse the system.

Rep. Harold Ford Jr., D-Tenn., told the group that after having trouble correcting a mistake he found in his credit report, he learned that many of his constituents also had experienced that same problem.

"The other person also had my name," he explained, "but Harold was spelled differently. I thought it was inherently unfair that when the credit-reporting agency received information about me, they didn't go check it out. Hopefully before this Congress is up we will take some action."

The impact of a 1999 federal law that required all federal payments to be transferred electronically has meant that many low-income consumers pay higher fees to obtain their federal benefit checks, according to Philadelphia Legal Services attorney Irv Ackelsberg.

One argument for the direct deposit law was that it would get everyone into the banking system, but Ackelsberg said, that wasn't implemented. Instead many low-income consumers still depend on check-cashing stores.

Ackelsberg said one check-cashing firm near his office offers direct deposit through a relationship with a bank, but you still must go to the check-cashing store to get your money. The required fees include a $14.50 enrollment fee, a $1 per month maintenance
fee, and then a check-cashing fee of $1.95.

"What they do is turn that electronic transfer into a paper check," Ackelsberg said. "It used to be that you got a check and then paid a fee to cash it. Now you have to pay to get the check and then you still have to pay a fee to cash it."

In another case, he said, a check-cashing store charged his client $11 per month to have an automatic teller machine card, as well as $2.50 for each deposit into the account and $1 for each withdrawal.

Consumer Product Safety Commission Chairman Hal Stratton told the group that all-terrain vehicles, arsenic-treated wood, and baby bath seats are some of the products now under scrutiny by his agency. ATVs, he said, continue to cause approximately 11,000 injuries each year.

While consumers continue to face increasing challenges in finding safe and reliable products, they now are also seeing their ability to pursue remedies to problems threatened by binding arbitration clauses, according to attorney Michael Quirk of Trial Lawyers for Public Justice.

More and more consumers, Quirk says, are discovering that they must submit their disputes to a private arbitrator who is not obligated to follow the existing law in his or her decision.

Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., told the group that tougher food safety standards are needed, especially in the area of ready-to-eat products.

"USDA and FDA have provided guidelines to at-risk consumers such as pregnant women, yet none of this information is provided on a package label," she said. "If the meat industry cannot provide assurances that food is truly ready to eat for all consumers, then
the product should bear a label warning at-risk consumers of their risk."

Clinton says she will co-sponsor legislation with Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, designed to set stronger performance standards for the meat and poultry industry.

-- Bob Richards is a Madison-based consumer advocate. He's the author of It's in the Fine Print.

blank image

National Headquarters
1717 Massachusetts Avenue, NW 
Suite 800
Washington, DC 20036-2001
ph: 202-797-8600
fax: 202-232-7203

TLPJ Logo
Trial Lawyers for Public Justice
© 2005 The TLPJ Foundation
www.tlpj.org

West Coast Office
555 12th Street
Suite 1620
Oakland, CA 94607-3636
ph: 510-622-8150
fax: 510-622-8155