|
[http://tlpj.org/left_nav_interior.htm]
|
 |
 |
 |

2005
Trial Lawyer of the Year Award Finalists Announced
Finalists
Represent ‘Best and Brightest’ Work of Trial Bar on Public Justice Cases
The TLPJ Foundation has named the attorneys who
worked on four outstanding cases as finalists for its 2005 Trial Lawyer of the
Year Award. The nationally prestigious award is bestowed annually upon the trial
lawyer or lawyers who have made the greatest contribution to the public interest
by trying or settling a precedent-setting case. The winner will be announced on
July 26, 2005, at The TLPJ Foundation’s Annual Gala and Awards Dinner at The
Carlu, an historic art deco venue in Toronto.
"These stellar attorneys and cases demonstrate how the best and
brightest of the trial bar bring their talents to winning justice for
individuals and groups who otherwise would have no recourse," said TLPJ
Foundation President Jeffrey M. Goldberg of The Jeffrey M. Goldberg Law Offices
in Chicago.
The finalists – 31 lawyers in four cases – were nominated for their
committed work in cases addressing a broad range of social issues, including
exposing defense contractor fraud, protecting the public water supply, forcing
Big Tobacco to help smokers quit, and addressing safety defects in police cars.
This year’s finalists are listed alphabetically below.
- Chicago-based lawyers Michael I. Behn of Futterman Howard, Steven
A. Miller of Sachnoff & Weaver, Bruce C. Howard of
Robert D. Allison & Associates, Michael Jaskula of Soule, Bradtke
& Lambert, and Thomas Asch, then "of counsel" to
Sachnoff & Weaver, won justice after a 16-year battle for two
whistleblowers who were fired and blackballed by one of the nation’s
largest defense contractors for exposing massive fraud against the Pentagon
in the mid-to-late 1980s. In U.S. ex rel. Robinson v. Northrop
Grumman Corporation, a suit first filed in federal court in the Northern
District of Illinois in 1989, the attorneys used the qui tam or
"whistleblower" provisions of the federal False Claims Act to
achieve a March 2005 settlement in which Northrop agreed to pay a total of
$133 million, including $12.4 million to the whistleblowers as well as a
confidential amount in compensation for Northrop’s retaliation against
them. The case was noteworthy for damning, "smoking gun" evidence
uncovered by the plaintiffs’ legal team showing that Northrop officials
concealed major accounting irregularities and misled Pentagon auditors. This
evidence finally persuaded the Justice Department to reverse its 1992
decision to stay out of the case (the first such reversal ever in a
whistleblower case). Robinson demonstrates that, when the federal
government refuses to hold corporations accountable for fraudulently
misusing taxpayer dollars, the trial bar’s dedication and determination
fills the void.
- Charleston, West Virginia attorneys Harry G. Deitzler of Hill,
Peterson, Carper, Bee & Deitzler, PLLC (Hill, Peterson), Larry A.
Winter of Winter Johnson & Hill PLLC, Robert A. Bilott and Gerald
J. Rapien of Cincinnati’s Taft, Stettinius & Hollister LLP, and R.
Edison Hill and James C. Peterson of Hill, Peterson sued
corporate giant DuPont for damages and medical monitoring stemming from
DuPont’s leaking of perfluorooctanoic acid or "C8" – a
chemical used in producing nonstick cookware – into the drinking water of
Mid-Ohio Valley residents living near DuPont’s Washington Works plant in
Parkersburg, West Virginia. (Initial studies have linked C8 to heart
attacks, breast cancer, and testicular cancer in humans.) After a
grueling, three-and-a-half-year class action battle in a West Virginia
county court, during which the attorneys uncovered evidence revealing that
DuPont was aware of C8’s potential toxicity as far back as 1961, the legal
team achieved an unprecedented $107.6 million settlement. Not only does the
settlement require DuPont to pay to determine whether the C8 it leaked into
the public water supply will harm human health and the environment, but the
bulk of the settlement will go toward creating the largest community health
study ever, covering some 80,000 people living along the Ohio River.
If the study links health effects to C8,
DuPont must spend up to another $235 million to monitor the health of
residents exposed to C8. Leach v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours forces
corporate polluters, for the first time, to pay to discover the health
consequences of their actions.
The evidence uncovered by the attorneys in
this case also helped spur the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to
reclassify C8 from a "suggested" to a "likely" carcinogen
on June 27, 2005.
- Russ M. Herman
and Stephen J. Herman of Herman, Herman, Katz
& Cotlar, L.L.P., in New Orleans, Bruce C. Dean of Bruce Dean,
L.L.C. and Deborah M. Sulzer of Gauthier, Houghtaling, Williams, and
Sulzer, both in Metairie, Louisiana, Robert L. Redfearn of New Orleans’
Simon, Peragine, Smith & Redfearn, Stephen B. Murray, Sr., and Stephen
B. Murray, Jr. of New Orleans’ Murray Law Firm, Walter J. Leger and
Christine L. DeSue of New Orleans’ Leger and Mestayer, Joseph M.
Bruno and David S. Scalia of New Orleans’ Bruno and Bruno, Kenneth
M. Carter of New Orleans’ Kenneth M. Carter, PLC, solo practitioner W.
James Singleton of Shreveport, Raul R. Bencomo of New Orleans’
Bencomo and Associates, Meyer H. Gertler and Louis L. Gertler of
New Orleans’ Gertler, Gertler, Vincent & Plotkin, Daniel E. Becnel,
Jr., of the Law Offices of Daniel E. Becnel, Jr., in Reserve, Louisiana,
and Jack M. Bailey, Jr., of Shreveport’s Law Offices of Jack M.
Bailey, Jr. won an unprecedented May 2004 jury verdict ordering the tobacco
industry to pay $590 million for a 10-year smoking cessation program to help
Louisiana smokers kick the habit. Scott v. American Tobacco Company, a
class action lawsuit against R.J. Reynolds, Philip Morris USA, Brown &
Williamson, Lorillard, and The Tobacco Institute, covers hundreds of thousands
of state residents who took up smoking between 1954, when the tobacco industry
began its 50-year cover-up about nicotine addiction and smoking’s connection
to disease, and May 1996, when the suit was filed. Evidence uncovered by the
plaintiffs’ team over the course of the three-year trial led the Scott jury
to find that the cigarette makers had engaged in fraud, conspired to distort
information about the dangers of smoking, and targeted Louisiana children in
their marketing. This landmark class-action verdict could ultimately save
thousands of lives by helping Louisiana smokers quit on the dime of the
companies that addicted them in the first place.
- Patrick J. McGroder
of the Phoenix firm Gallagher & Kennedy, P.A.,
and David L. Perry of Perry & Haas in Corpus Christi, Texas, have
made the country’s most popular police car, Ford’s Crown Victoria Police
Interceptor, safer for officers across the nation. Through Schechterle v.
Ford Motor Company, eight other Crown Vic cases, and a far-reaching public
education campaign, McGroder and Perry forced Ford to spend $350 million to
retrofit approximately 350,000 police cruisers to correct a defective design
that left the cruiser’s fuel tank vulnerable to instant ignition in
high-speed, rear-impact collisions – and led to the burning deaths of 18
officers. In Schechterle, an Arizona state court lawsuit settled in
April 2004, the team demonstrated that Ford knew the vehicle was a fire risk,
winning a confidential settlement for Phoenix police officer Jason
Schechterle, who sustained disfiguring burns to 50 percent of his body when a
speeding taxicab slammed into the back of his police cruiser on March 26,
2001. McGroder and Perry also commissioned the first-ever Crown Victoria
Police Interceptor crash tests at speeds over 75 m.p.h. These tests proved
that, with basic retrofits, the cruiser can withstand high-speed rear impacts without
the tank igniting. The trial lawyers then invested hundreds of thousands of
dollars to create retrofits, including bladder tank and fire suppression
technology, which were adopted by several law enforcement agencies even prior
to Ford’s retrofits, and which have saved six officers’ lives in crashes
to date. McGroder’s and Perry’s creative lawyering not only held Ford
publicly accountable for valuing profits over lives, but ultimately caused
Ford to take corrective action that will save hundreds of police officers’
lives.
###
Trial Lawyers for Public Justice is the only public interest law firm
dedicated to using trial lawyers’ skills and resources to advance the public
good. Founded in 1982, TLPJ utilizes a network of more than 3,000 of the nation’s
outstanding trial lawyers to pursue precedent-setting and socially significant
litigation. TLPJ has a wide-ranging litigation docket in the areas of consumer
rights, worker safety, civil rights and liberties, toxic torts, environmental
protection, and access to the courts. TLPJ is the principal project of The TLPJ
Foundation, a not-for-profit membership organization headquartered in
Washington, DC, with a West Coast office in Oakland, California. The TLPJ web
site address is www.tlpj.org.
|  |
 |