|
[http://tlpj.org/left_nav_interior.htm]
|
 |
 |
 |

Inmates Sue
Corrections Corporation of America for Negligence
That Sparked Riot, Excessive Force, and Inhumane
Treatment of Those Who Did Not Join in Riot
TLPJ Joins Plaintiffs’ Colorado Trial Team

Plaintiffs Oscar Barron
and Vance Adams, flanked by attorneys Deborah Taussig, Bill Trine, and Adele Kimmel. |
Trial Lawyers for Public Justice (TLPJ),
a national public interest law firm, announced on August 25, 2005, that
it had joined one of Colorado’s leading trial attorneys in a major
lawsuit on behalf of 86 inmates injured as a result of a riot at Crowley
County Correctional Facility (Crowley Facility) in Olney Springs,
Colorado. Filed in Crowley County District Court on July 19, 2005, the
inmates’ lawsuit charges Corrections Corporation of America (CCA), the
nation’s largest private prison operator, with negligence that sparked a
riot on July 20, 2004, use of excessive force during and after the riot,
and indiscriminate and inhumane treatment of inmates who were not
involved in the riot. None of the plaintiffs participated in the riot,
and all of their injuries were caused by CCA’s employees and agents, not
by other inmates.
“This lawsuit seeks to hold CCA accountable for its shameful misconduct
in last year’s riot at the Crowley Facility,” said TLPJ Staff Attorney
Adele P. Kimmel, joining as co-counsel for the plaintiffs. “CCA
mishandled matters at every turn, negligently causing and failing to
contain a foreseeable riot, using unlawful and excessive force against
inmates who obeyed orders and did not participate in the riot, and
treating compliant inmates in an inhumane and indiscriminate manner for
weeks after the riot had been contained.”
An October 2004 “After Action Report” prepared by the Colorado
Department of Corrections (DOC) offers strong support for the
plaintiffs’ claim that CCA could have prevented the riot in the first
place. The Report cites a variety of CCA’s blunders as factors that led
to the riot. For example, CCA ignored repeated warnings that paying
inmates vastly different wages based on the state they hailed from
rather than their actual work assignments, refusing to hear inmates’
grievances, and feeding inmates skimpy portions of lousy food would lead
to a riot. CCA also staffed the Crowley Facility with a skeleton crew of
poorly trained employees, who were unprepared to quell a disruption
before it became a full-blown riot. According to the After Action
Report, CCA staff submitted detailed reports to supervisory staff
describing anticipated trouble from some inmates in the days prior to
the actual riot – but to no avail. The Report also documents a host of
serious lapses in CCA’s emergency preparedness at the Crowley Facility
that hampered the ability to gain control of the disturbance before it
became a riot.
Newly released documents from the State Inspector General’s Office
support the plaintiffs’ further charges that CCA’s employees and agents
used excessive and unreasonable force on inmates who did not riot,
evidencing a desire to punish everyone even after containing the riot.
The widespread punishment of these bystanders included forcing tightly
bound inmates to urinate and defecate in their clothing, dragging
handcuffed inmates from their cells by their ankles face down through
glass shards and raw sewage, withholding drinking water and medications,
denying shower privileges and clean clothes for more than a week,
feeding inmates an inadequate and unvaried diet of distasteful baloney
sandwiches for a month, and forcing inmates to strip and shower in front
of female guards.
“The riot at the Crowley Facility, and the manner in which obedient
inmates were treated, was the result of CCA’s profiteering,” said lead
counsel William A. Trine of
Trine & Metcalf, P.C. in Boulder. “CCA’s
desire to make a buck at the Crowley Facility resulted in understaffing
and inadequate training of staff on the proper use of force. The pain
compliance techniques used on innocent bystanders who were complying
with orders were unnecessary, unreasonable, and inconducive to restoring
a healthy climate between inmates and staff. CCA has yet to correct the
conditions that resulted in the riot. If anything, conditions at Crowley
have worsened since the riot. This lawsuit offers the only mechanism for
holding CCA accountable and preventing a future riot.”
The inmates’ legal team in Adams v. Corrections Corporation of
America also includes Deborah A. Taussig of Trine & Metcalf, P.C.
To read the amended complaint in Adams,
click here.
^^ BACK TO TOP ^^
|
 |
 |