|
| |
|
|
 |
 |
 |

SEATTLE TO CLEAR ARREST RECORDS, PAY $1 MILLION TO WTO PROTESTERS WRONGFULLY
ARRESTED IN 1999
Settlement Requires Overhaul of Police Training

The City of Seattle has agreed to pay $1 Million
and clear the arrest records of WTO Protesters
who were wrongfully arrested in 1999. |
In a landmark settlement
reached by Public Justice on behalf of scores of people
arrested in 1999 while peacefully protesting the World Trade
Organization, the City of Seattle has agreed to seal and
expunge the records of what a jury earlier determined to be
their
unconstitutional arrests by Seattle police.
In addition, the settlement mandates that the City improve
police training in order to prevent unconstitutional mass
arrests in the future. Finally, the City will pay $1 million
to compensate the protesters for the violation of their
constitutional rights and the costs of bringing the lawsuit.
|
Notice of Class Action
Settlement to WTO Protesters
If you were arrested in
Seattle, Washington, on the morning of December 1, 1999, at Westlake
Park, you could get a payment from a class action settlement. For a copy
of the settlement agreement,
click here; for the notice of a class action settlement,
click
here; for the claims form due by August
28, 2007,
click
here.
|
Following an 11-day trial in January, a civil court jury
found the City liable for violating the
protesters’ Fourth Amendment rights. The verdict in Hankin
v. City of Seattle and settlement followed seven years of
litigation and determined work by the Public Justice legal
team.
“It’s a shame when justice is delayed any length of time,
especially seven years,” said lead plaintiff Kenneth Hankin,
a Boeing fuel systems engineer. “The verdict and this
settlement not only vindicate the rights of the people who
peacefully and lawfully protested in 1999, but will help
ensure that future dissent is treated as intended in a free
society.”
The class action lawsuit, filed in 2000, arose from the
events of December 1, 1999, when police corralled and
arrested approximately 175 people who were peacefully
protesting the WTO in downtown Seattle’s Westlake Park. The
City had invited and encouraged the WTO to hold its
ministerial conference in Seattle. By the time the
conference began in late November, tens of thousands of
individuals and organizations with a range of concerns from
globalization and labor to endangered species and human
rights converged on the city to protest WTO policies.
After one day of widespread but largely peaceful protest,
Seattle’s mayor declared a swath of the downtown business
core off-limits to all but certain citizens in what many
observers saw as an exaggerated response to isolated
disturbances by some individuals. Although the order did not
specifically prohibit protests within the area, city
officials and Seattle police called it a “no protest zone.”
Hundreds of peaceful protesters were then arrested.
All charges against those arrested in the “zone” were later
dropped, but not before many of the demonstrators were held
in jail for up to four days — until the WTO conference had
ended. No police officers were ever reprimanded or
disciplined by the City.
Based largely on testimony by Seattle Police Department
leaders, Public Justice co-lead trial counsel Michael Withey
argued that the arrests adhered to City policy or, at
minimum, had been approved by policymakers within the
department. The jury agreed, finding that the City was
responsible for the unconstitutional arrests. In addition to
Withey, the plaintiffs were represented at trial by Public
Justice co-lead trial counsel Tyler Weaver of Seattle;
Seattle attorney Fred Diamondstone; and attorney Leslie
Bailey, the Brayton-Baron Fellow at Public Justice.
After the jury verdict, Seattle faced further litigation on
the damages owed to the peaceful
protesters it unconstitutionally arrested. To avoid the
trials, the City agreed to settle the case.
“This settlement brings to a close an important chapter in
the history of this City,” said Withey. “The lesson to draw
is that the full constitutional rights of citizens can be
guaranteed at the same time public safety is secured. The
court, the jury and now the City of Seattle have validated
this vital principle. We are proud to hold the city
accountable and to contribute to this important victory.”
Weaver said he was pleased that the Westlake Park
demonstrators would be compensated, but that the full
outcome of the case has a much more significant meaning.
“Most importantly, the jury’s verdict in this case is a sign
that our Constitution is alive and well,”Weaver said. “I am
hopeful that this case will send a message not only to the
City of Seattle but to cities around the country that mass
arrests of peaceful, law-abiding protesters will not and
cannot be tolerated.”
Diamondstone noted that the settlement serves “an important
lesson for police departments around the country that have
looked to Seattle’s WTO experience” when large numbers of
protesters gather in other large cities. “The proper lesson
is to avoid repetition of the fiasco in Seattle by allowing
peaceful protesters to gather, as guaranteed by the
Constitution,” Diamondstone said.
Pursuant to the settlement agreement, which is subject to
court approval, the City of Seattle has agreed not only to
seal its own records of the arrests, but also to formally
request that other agencies expunge any records they may
have received or maintained regarding the December 1, 1999
arrests. The City will also notify the agencies that the
Westlake class members were never tried or convicted of any
offense. The sealing and expungement of arrest records is of
particular importance to members of the class, who were
concerned about the potential effect on their reputations
and good standing in the eyes of law enforcement.
Perhaps most significantly, the City has agreed to
incorporate key court rulings from the Hankin case into
police training. Those rulings make clear that police lacked
probable cause to arrest both the peaceful protesters at
Westlake and others arrested outside the “no protest zone.”
Improved training will help ensure that police officers will
protect individuals’ constitutional rights against unlawful
search and seizure in the future.
The monetary settlement negotiated by Public Justice will
secure a financial recovery for each protester in the range
of $3,000 to $10,000, depending on the number of class
members who file claims. The settlement fund will be paid
with insurance proceeds, rather than by City taxpayers.
In addition to the trial team, the plaintiffs were
represented by Public Justice Staff Attorney Victoria Ni and
Public Justice Executive Director Arthur Bryant.
|
 |
 |
|
 |
National
Headquarters
1825 K Street, NW
Suite 200
Washington, DC 20006
ph: 202-797-8600
fax: 202-232-7203 |

Public Justice
© 2007 Public Justice Foundation
www.publicjustice.net |
West Coast
Office
555 12th Street
Suite 1620
Oakland, CA 94607
ph: 510-622-8150
fax: 510-622-8155 |
|
|